≡ Menu

Why I Decided to Write for the General Market

I entered into the field of writing by way of Christians and the Christian market. At the time (2005), this seemed like the natural thing to do for me. I’d become a believer in 1980, pastored a church for a period of time, and was spiritually restless, wanting to find new avenues for creativity and spiritual growth. When the Christian magazine I subscribed to held a short story contest, I decided to enter and earned an honorable mention. A spark was struck. From there, I joined a Christian writers group. This led to the publication of other short stories and a growing familiarity with the Christian market. Eventually, I wrote a novel aimed at this market, acquired an agent, and was signed to a two book contract with a Christian publishing house.

However, over the years, I’ve wrestled a lot with the Christian market and have never felt quite at home there.

To be clear, I’m not one of those who labels all Christian fiction as mediocre, preachy, and poorly crafted junk. Over the last decade, I’ve read many terrific works published as Christian fiction and met many gifted, hard-working Christian writers. The caricatures of Christian fiction as being shallow and crappy are mostly unfair. There are legitimate reasons to write for Christians and remaining in the Christian market can be a smart endeavor for some. I don’t slight those who choose to write in that genre. Furthermore, my experience in Christian publishing circles, the writers and readers I’ve met, the agents and editors I’ve met and worked with, have been wonderful. All to say, my experience as a Christian fiction author is mostly good.

So why move to the general market?

Well, there’s no one single reason. Rather, it’s a confluence of different feelings and impressions. Here’s a few:

I’ve grown tired of the narrow theological strictures that dominate and define Christian fiction. More than once my stories have been parsed for doctrinal integrity and found wanting. This is frustrating because I consider myself fairly orthodox. I believe  in the innerancy of Scripture, the deity of Christ, salvation by grace through faith, etc. Nevertheless, today’s Christian fiction readers demand fairly strict adherence to a set of doctrinal parameters in their fiction. (This is especially problematic as a speculative fiction writer; being free to actually SPECULATE while still being held to strict theological parameters is quite difficult!)

I’ve wearied of the argument that Christian fiction must be “clean.” Having trafficked in “the real world” most of my life, I’m used to people acting and speaking in ways that aren’t always pretty. Or conducive to my faith or personal values. Which is probably why I write characters who act similarly. Christians like to say that God accepts us as we are. Apparently, they do not extend similar grace to the characters in their novels. Thus, Christian fiction has come to be defined as the absence of profanity, sex, and excessive violence. Elsewhere, I’ve described this as a sort of “white magic” — the belief that keeping certain words and images out of my story makes it intrinsically less worldly and more holy.

Christian fiction potentially nurtures and perpetuates a dangerously narrow, unhealthy subculture. As I’ve written before, contemporary Evangelical fiction is tethered to Fundamentalist roots. Much of the Christian art industry — Christian film / fiction / music — is a reaction against secularism. This posture can be traced back to early Fundamentalism’s withdraw from many American institutions like politics and entertainment. Holiness, for Fundamentalists, came to be defined in terms of “negatives” — no smoking, no drinking, no movies, no makeup, no dancing, etc., etc. Much of the evangelical counter culture was rooted in this cultural separation. Likewise, Christian fiction appeals to and nurtures this idea of “separation.” Our fiction is different than other fiction. So while being “salt and light” means interacting with the “bland and light-less,” the Christian fiction market theoretically avoids all such “worldly” spoilage, preaches to the choir, and potentially isolates us from the marketplaces of ideas.

The demographics of the Christian market are not “speculative fiction” friendly. I’ve written a lot about this subject (like THIS) and won’t cover that ground again here. Suffice to say, with 80-some percent of Christian fiction titles being Amish, romance, and women’s fiction, speculative fiction writers and fans have managed little traction in the Christian market and have found a shortage of spec titles offered.

I simply want to reach a larger, more “spec savvy,” audience. As a fan of Dean Koontz, Jim Butcher’s Dresden Files, Neil Gaiman, Lovecraft, and Stephen King, I want to engage similar readers. Interestingly enough, many of these fans are Christians (or, at the least, not averse to a Christian worldview). However, these fans are not limited to the “Christian fiction” aisle. Nor is their reading confined to “clean,” theologically tight, fictional fare. Hardcore spec readers graze in larger pastures than the current Christian market cultivates. And that’s where I’d like to be.

Needless to say, moving from the Christian market to the general market will probably be a bit of a balancing act.

On one hand will be the issue of balancing spiritual content to a “secular” audience. Christian writers will often say that their stories are too religious for the general market and too gritty or unorthodox for the Christian market. That’s part of the problem — if that IS a problem — I’m getting at here. I want my general market stories to contain spiritual content. This doesn’t mean that all my stories will contain an overt religious theme or strong Christian character. But no writer can completely divorce their worldview from their stories. So while I’m not writing to preach to my readers, I’m not afraid to admit I have a worldview and beliefs that, with some excavation, can be uncovered in my general market novels. Will this turn some readers off? Maybe.

On the other hand will be my attempt to balance an existing platform developed in the Christian market with a broader, less “religious” audience. So this is the opposite issue — trying to maintain enough spiritual / religious themes to engage Christian readers. Sure, a savvy Christian reader does not require all their doctrinal i’s dotted and t’s crossed. Nevertheless, as one with a huge interest in theology and philosophy, I respect that readers seek stories that resonate with the Truth. A potential difficulty will be engaging readers who have bought my books because of the “Christian” elements, while not scaring them off with the more fanciful, gritty, unorthodox elements.

I know. I’m probably over-thinking this.

Anyway.

Bottom line: I want to write stories that contain spiritual themes and religious content but are free to noodle around with weird science, un-orthodox ideas, unholy characters, who sometimes think bad thoughts and use bad language Risky? Perhaps.

Either way, for the first time in ten years I have published a novel that is not tagged as “Christian fiction.” And, frankly, I’m really happy about it.

{ 21 comments… add one }
  • Matt Mikalatos November 24, 2014, 8:20 AM

    Me too!

    Although I’m hoping to do both. CBA non-fiction and general market fiction. I debated whether to take on a pen name, but then I thought if using one name worked for C.S. Lewis and G.K. Chesterton, it can work for me.

    I didn’t adopt the whole two initials and then your last name thing, though.

  • Greta Boris November 24, 2014, 8:20 AM

    This is a very timely post for me. I, too, am a Christian and just finished my first novel. It’s with one agent now, but I know I should pitch more. I’ve been debated whether to go Christian market or hit the broader market. I’m describing my book as real housewives of the OC meet Dante’s Inferno. Not exactly Amish romance. You’ve given me something to think about.

    I hope you keep us posted on your success going general.

    • Mike Duran November 25, 2014, 5:33 AM

      “real housewives of the OC meet Dante’s Inferno”

      Wow. Now THAT’S a genre mash-up.

  • Kessie November 24, 2014, 11:00 AM

    It’s fine to write for different markets! I hope you do well, too! I just think its too bad that you have to justify it.

  • kathy November 24, 2014, 11:22 AM

    Holy crap. I think I love you! YESSSS!!!! lolol
    omg, that IS the essential DILEMMA, isn’t it!!
    I too am trying to “reach” the “real world” but they’ll only ACCEPT the squeaky clean, Puritanized world for the CBA! OOOOo you just pushed me over, Mister. THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!

  • D.M. Dutcher November 24, 2014, 12:38 PM

    I understand this, man, but is there really no hope for a Christian spec fic culture any more? It seems like it’s just an impossible dream now.

    • Johne Cook November 24, 2014, 3:33 PM

      Many of us have tried to excite interest in such a culture for years – decades – and have come up short (to put it mildly / kindly). Most of us have found other avenues to share our common interest (and, indeed, the internet has been a real boon for finding other like-minded Christian creatives). If Christendom has been so apathetic (at best) and hostile toward a Christian Spec Fic culture, we have found our common ties outside of Christendom but not outside of Christ. We ran out of the culture that wouldn’t accept us and found others like us out there, still worshipping Christ, still enjoying speculative fiction, just without their disdain and rancor.
      http://grooveshark.com/s/Run/77XI2F?src=5

      • D.M. Dutcher November 24, 2014, 10:10 PM

        But there’s no Christian dimension to that. I mean, the culture will always be secular, even if we band together. It’s not really rancor, but just a feeling of forever being on the outside. Saddens me more than I like to admit.

    • Mike Duran November 25, 2014, 6:31 AM

      David, I DO think there’s hope for Christian spec-fic if we are willing and able to reconfigure our expectations about what the genre is, what it should be, and how we can engage hardcore spec readers.

  • christa allan November 24, 2014, 12:40 PM

    I recently described myself as a Christian who writes fiction not as someone who writes Christian fiction.

    Maybe it’s semantics, but it’s a world of difference…to me.

    • Sibella Giorello November 24, 2014, 1:07 PM

      Mike, good post.

      This is a dilemma, but maybe not a necessary one. Good stories rise above labels and sometimes even genres. At the very least, stories should rise above our cheap desires to stuff them inside comfortable box of our own making. That’s not fiction. That’s propaganda.

      As Flannery O’Connor once said, “The Catholic (or Christian) novelist doesn’t have to be a saint; he doesn’t even have to be Catholic; he does, unfortunately, have to be a novelist.” (Highly recommend O’Connor’s writings on faith and fiction).

      Thanks for taking the braver route. Much appreciated.

      Sibella

      Go forth and write.

    • Sibella Giorello November 24, 2014, 1:08 PM

      Christa, I like that distinction.

  • Sibella Giorello November 24, 2014, 1:07 PM

    Mike, good post.

    This is a dilemma, but maybe not a necessary one. Good stories rise above labels and sometimes even genres. At the very least, stories should rise above our cheap desires to stuff them inside comfortable box of our own making. That’s not fiction. That’s propaganda.

    As Flannery O’Connor once said, “The Catholic (or Christian) novelist doesn’t have to be a saint; he doesn’t even have to be Catholic; he does, unfortunately, have to be a novelist.” (Highly recommend O’Connor’s writings on faith and fiction).

    Thanks for taking the braver route. Much appreciated.

    Sibella

    Go forth and write.

  • Sibella Giorello November 24, 2014, 1:10 PM

    Sorry.
    I hit “reply” twice. Typical.

  • Amy November 24, 2014, 3:56 PM

    I can’t fault your logic. You’re miles ahead of me in terms of audience and platform, but I came to basically the same conclusion for my own fiction writing. I’ll be publishing under the name Elizabeth McCleary for fiction, but may also publish under my real name for non-fiction, not because I want to hide anything, but because spec-fic and Christian/Inspirational non-fiction are two very different markets that don’t necessarily play nice together.

  • Merrie Destefano November 24, 2014, 5:23 PM

    Been there, Mike. =) My first novel, Afterlife, almost made it into CBA, but not quite. It ended up getting published in the general market and, honestly, that was the best place for it. And for me. Love The Ghost Box!

  • Mark Carver November 24, 2014, 7:42 PM

    It’s cool that you’re taking this step, and so far it’s been well-received. Every third book I write is for the secular market, though my Christian market books are too edgy and coarse for the Christian bookstores anyway. I hear your sentiments echoed by so many writers and I think it is going to be only a few more years before major Christian publishers take notice. It’s already happening, but on a small scale. The publishing houses are testing the waters, afraid if how deep it might be. In the meantime, indie and small-pubbed authors are stirring up quite a storm. It’s like striking a flint on wet wood; eventually it will catch fire.

  • Peter Younghusband November 25, 2014, 2:37 AM

    Hi Mike, Can I have your permission to link this post to my book review blog? I have an Articles of Interest page where I include articles to get readers/visitors to think about all things Christian Fiction. The Edgy Christian Speculative fiction is a genre that I love reading in so your post is very appropriate for this Articles of Interest page.

    Regards and Thanks

Leave a Reply