Following is more evidence that atheists are an angry bunch. After posting comments from Stuart Blessman, a blogger who’d attended an advanced screening of Expelled, Jeffrey Overstreet’s Looking Closer Journal was inundated with pissed off anti-theists. The documentary explores the Intelligent Design debate, and that particular screening involved a surprise visit from notable atheist Richard Dawkins. Blessman shared some opinions about the film, as well as observations about the party crashers, which Overstreet posted with some appropriate disqualifiers.
Overstreet’s INITIAL POST was visited by over 10,000 new visitors in several hours, mostly angry atheists (who had not seen the film). It has forced Mr. Overstreet to suspend comments on that post. He writes:
I’ve been buried in hate mail from evolutionists and athiests in the last 24 hours, much of it laced with obscenities and spectacular recommendations about sex acts that Christians should go and do with themselves. Ah, what fine representatives for their worldview. Very little of the response has borne any substance. (I’ve posted some of the comments that came in, but only those that were offered with civility and restraint. I eventually gave up on sifting through the pile for looking for more.)
It’s rather surprising to see this kind of thing coming from folks who will, at the same time, write off Christians as judgmental and hateful. It’s rather surprising to see such offense taken, as if there really is an absolute right and wrong written into the universe after all. Interesting, huh?
It reminded me, though on a MUCH smaller scale, of my recent exchange with atheist blogger Austin Cline. My tongue-in-cheek Thanksgiving post, Can Atheists Really Give Thanks, was picked up on Cline’s site and sent my Site Meter spiking. His post, Mike Duran: Can Atheists Really “Give Thanks”?, received 133 comments. In them, I was called “stupid,” “inane,” “delusional,” bigoted” and, my favorite, a foot soldier for the “Christian Right.” I eventually capsulized my Response to Austin Cline’s Agnosticism / Atheism Blog, wherein I laid out a formal rebuttal of Cline’s position and his misrepresentation of myself. (Alas, Mr. Cline never responded.)
As a result of the name-calling and misrepresentation, I concluded in that post,
If anything, my encounter with Austin Cline and his readers reinforces the caricature of the “angry atheist.†Atheism is not a passive unbelief in God, but a brazen assertion in his non-existence. For the most part, atheism is really anti-theism – an aggressive counterattack against religion and the religious. After my encounter with Cline, I’m wondering if this “hostility†against theists is actually what drives many atheists.
Sad to say, but the reaction / over-reaction to Overstreet and Blessman’s posts is not new. Not only does it pique my interest about the film, but it makes me wonder if we aren’t seeing a trend here. I mean, are all atheists this hostile?
There sure does seem to be a lot of anger…
On Easter, my church met at a big auditorium at Connecticut college. My pastor invited ex-govenor John Rowland to speak. Mr. Rowland had gotten caught up in a money scandel and did several months in prison. He came on Easter to share his testimony- about his struggle with arrogance, his faith, the fact that prison was hte best thing to happen to him… He gave a humble, and uplifting talk, and of course the paper was there. Here are some comments from readers: “Why doesn’t that slime ball stay in Waterbury where he belongs?”…”Gee, seems like Rowland is fleecing people again, now just with “Grace” Rowland…can’t you just go away!”…” What a bunch of Bull****!!!!!!!!”…”The only thing former governor Rowland is sorry for is he got caught.”…”This felon makes a mockery of faith. Any pastor who invites him to speak on one of the holiest days of the year should have his judgement questioned. John Rowland continues his con, and is laughing all the way to the bank.”
All I can say is I’d rather spend time with people who are a whole lot more forgiving and gracious.
When I proposed this very idea back when, you disagreed with me, Mike.
I also said hate was the source for the vitriol and you disagreed. Maybe you’re right on that one. I know Hate is a strong word, but if not hate, then what is the catalyst.
Sure, it may start with a legitimate philosphical difference, but at some point, they (meaning a large percentage) cross the line. Maybe it’s built up frustration at our “ignorance” and “naivety” causing us to not see something so simple a concept as-there is no God.
But I’m thinking maybe it is hate. Hate cultivated from their reaction to our thoughts, actions, beliefs, moral standards, cultural influence, incorrectly percieved sterotypes, correctly percieved stereotypes, fallen pastors, etc, etc, etc.