No matter what happens in the future, rock and roll will save the world. — The Who guitarist, Pete Townshend.
There’s no shortage of rock stars who believe, like Mr. Townsend, that “rock and roll will save the world.” It’s a lofty proposition, I know. But what do you expect from 60 year-old guys wearing spandex. And pardon my pessimism, but wouldn’t it help if they could get along with each other before they started trying to fix the world. Seems every other music award is marred by fisticuffs, violence or arrests. Isn’t this the crowd that says “Give Peace a Chance”?
Either way, rock stars have a long history of political activism. Last election, for instance, a gang of musicians formed Rockers against Bush, Vol. I and Vol. II. So what if bands named Rancid, Anti-Flag, and The Soviettes were lecturing us on the ills of Conservatism. Then there was the Vote for Change Tour ’04, which brought out the big guns. Artists like Bruce Springsteen, Dave Matthews Band, R.E.M., Dixie Chicks, and Pearl Jam united for “the common goal of voting President Bush out of office in November [’04]”. But the only “change” they really made was the amount of cannabis in the atmosphere. And speaking of the environment, who could deny the impact of Live Earth‘s massive global concerts to “Save the Planet.” I mean, besides the cancellations and dreadful attendance, they left a carbon footprint the size of Hiroshima.
Now with the Presidential Election in full swing, the glitterati are out in force. Barack Obama has clearly created the most buzz, and I’m thinking it’s because he’s being called “the rock star of politics”. Course, what with the history of rockers and politics, I’m not sure if that’s a good thing. Either way, he’s definitely getting his share of celebrity endorsements.
But do celebrity endorsements matter? Most statistics say it’s negligible. According to the Pew Research Center, voters are 18% more likely to select a candidate endorsed by their minister, priest or rabbi. Just below the clergy, is Oprah Winfrey is at 15%. Perhaps even more disturbing is Angelina Jolie (6%) and Kanye West (4%). Why anyone would base their political opinions upon what Kanye West says, is beyond me.
For the record, Bruce Springsteen‘s opinion about who I should vote for in ’08 matters 0%. That goes for Green Day, Dave Matthew’s Band, Neil Young, and Rancid. Since when did knowing how to play a guitar, strut on a stage, and growl into a mic, make someone an expert on foreign affairs and domestic spending. Heck, half these celebrities can’t stay married or pass a piss test, and yet they want to advise us on how to end genocide in Darfur. Puhlease!
Maybe this is why Alice Cooper’s spin is so refreshing:
“If you’re listening to a rock star in order to get your information on who to vote for, you’re a bigger moron than they are. Why are we rock stars? Because we’re morons. We sleep all day, we play music at night and very rarely do we sit around reading the Washington Journal.”
“Besides,” he continued, “when I read the list of people who are supporting [John] Kerry, if I wasn’t already a Bush supporter, I would have immediately switched. Linda Ronstadt? Don Henley? Geez, that’s a good reason right there to vote for Bush.”
Forget that this guy paints his face and scowls a lot. In an age where celebrities are idolized, and their endorsements are coveted, Cooper’s opinion is a much-needed shout-out to the media-numbed masses. Perhaps if we formed our political opinions through humble dialog and thoughtful study, rather than through the on-stage diatribe of a millionaire with bleached hair, a tongue stud, and a minimal grasp of world history, we’d be better off.
Either way, with an important election looming for American voters, we can expect the celebrity endorsements to fly. Oprah for Obama. B.S. for Clinton. Michael Moore for Fidel Castro. Oh well, look on the bright side: If worse comes to worse, we can always form Rock Against Hillary Vol. I.
Great post, Mike. Rock on. Err, thoughtfully.
celebrities have as much right to state their political opinions as anyone. you might not agree with their endorsements but so what. you don’t have to listen to their music or vote for the candidate they endorse. its what makes america great.
No one is suggesting they don’t have a right to their opinions. It’s only when they assume they know what they’re talking about when they mostly demonstrate they don’t by parroting what they’ve heard the candidates say. Alice Cooper nails it.
People talk about Christians living in a “bubble”. Give me a break. Fame creates a bubble which is as surreal as any one of us actually thinking we’re important in the bigger scheme of things–and especially compared to the One who created all of us.
Jason, I’m not questioning someone’s right to “voice their opinion” here, as much as I am the cult of personality that we allow to “shape our opinion” of the issues. Celebrity endorsements are cool insofar as that celebrity is well-informed and honestly stating the facts.
Not to mention the fact that many of these celebrities are high-school dropouts, among other things.
The thing that really scares me about politics nowadays is that the two camps are completely divided. Nowhere does anyone work for compromise and common ground. You work for your party, and the other side is “the enemy”. The hatred and vitriol still surprises me.
Amen to Mark’s comment. Which is why I agree with what my friend Joe says: what we need most is a candidate who can bring people together.
Regarding musicians trying to use their art for something other than entertaining (i.e. making a political statement, raising AIDs awareness, trying to “Feed the world”), I think it’s great. Songwriters, like novel writers, have something to say. I think the problem comes (and I think this is what you were saying, Mike?) when people choose to take the opinions of celebrities and adopt them as their own without any personal study on the matter.