Perception Analyzers: The Death of Debate

Perhaps the worst thing to happen to politics since the advent of the TV has been The Perception Analyzer. It’s that handheld device used for dial-group testing of products, advertisements, television and radio programs, feature films, and now, political debates. If a certain statement gives you a rise, you crank it. If another gesture angers you, then you dial down. Maybe it’s a sign of the times, what with technology influencing nearly every aspect of our existence, but I can’t help but see this as a disastrous trend.

Not only does it force politicians to speak in terms of sound bites, it moves the discussion away from the articulation of issues to the manipulation of perceptions. Besides, how the hell can you listen to a debate if you’re fiddling with knobs and a joystick?

Long ago, people believed that study, introspection, meditation, and reflection were integral parts of human growth. Apparently, that age is long gone. Why allow ideas and opinions to sink in for further thought when you can see your judgments rendered in real time? Face it: Reflection is no longer a part of American politics. Perception Analyzers are training us away from contemplation, and forcing us to frame political discourse as an emotive rather than intellectual exercise.

Hey, maybe next election we can wire our guys to a polygraph. Just think of it: Candidates on lie detectors and the audience on Perceptions Analyzers. Excuse me, I think I’m spiking…