I’ve become quite fond of watching documentaries, and one I’ve been tempted to see is Errol Morris’ Standard Operating Procedure. It examines the alleged incidents of abuse and torture of suspected terrorists by U.S. forces at the Abu Ghraib prison in Guantanamo Bay. Morris is a fantastic documentarian and this film is being hailed as one of his best, both provocative and disturbing.
It follows in a long line of documentaries concerning the war in Iraq. Michael Moore’s Academy Award winning Fahrenheit 9/11, Body of War, Breaking the Silence: Truth and Lies in the War on Terror, Fallujah, The Hidden Massacre, No End in Sight, and last year’s Academy Award winning Taxi to the Dark Side, which, like SOP, focuses on the military’s “possible” use of torture.
It doesn’t take much to see that these documentaries have more in common than just the war in Iraq and Afghanistan — they are all antagonistic toward the war effort, and critical of United States policy and practice. To put it bluntly: All these war documentaries seem to have the same agenda.
Which is one of the reasons I’m reluctant to watch the Abu Ghraib documentary. Actually, it’s the same reason I haven’t seen any of the above mentioned documentaries. Call me close-minded, obstinate, discrimantory. But in a country that stresses diversity, differences of opinion, I just don’t understand why we can’t get both sides of the issue concerning the War on Terrorism.
Perhaps I’m part of a dying breed, but the 9/11 attacks rocked my world. Many of those images scarred my emotional retina. I will never forget the horror of seeing innocent civilians clinging to the windows of the World Trade Center, preparing to plummet to their deaths. Hearing the heartbreaking phone calls from United 93 as those brave civilians prepared to storm their hijackers. And I remember Nick Burg screaming in agony as his head was sawed off by fanatical Muslims. Unlike the cliched placards that displayed, oh so briefly, our resolve to remember that terrible day, I WILL NEVER FORGET.
The problem is, the American media has. Videos and pictures of terrorism’s after-effects are consigned to internet echo chambers, stamped with cautionary notices, and stripped of their visceral impact. The victims of 9/11 are memorialized, but never seen. The tactics of Islamic extremists are left undenounced while we conjure socio-political theories about their angst. Terrorism has become a blurb on the news, its victims simply names on an ethereal roll call…
…while documentaries about U.S. atrocities and torture roll out and receive Academy Awards.
This makes me very angry.
I’m still waiting for the day that Michael Moore trains his lenses upon the mangled victims of a suicide bombing, innocents who been horribly disfigured or dismembered, families that have, literally, been torn apart, by terrorists. I’m still waiting for Errol Morris to document the splattered remains of Americans who plumetted to their deaths, stewardesses whose throats were splayed by box cutters, and firemen who were vaporized under thousands of tons of concrete. I’m still waiting for the real documentary on terrorism.
But sadly, our documentarians are too busy criticizing America.
I believe what John McCain, a victim of torture, said — that by employing torture tactics we become no better than our enemies. Am I suggesting that terrorism justifies the use of torture? No. I am suggesting that a lop-sided view of the issue tweaks our opinion. But until Americans demand both sides of the story, lop-sided is what we’ll get.
There’s got to be a psychological name for. Maybe delusional pacifism. It’s one thing to be against war. I’m against war. But they don’t seem to understand that you have to defend yourself. They believe that any violence against americans is just because it has been antagonized.
These are the same people who believe that if someone attacks your family, you should let them and then call the police after.
“But until Americans demand both sides of the story, lop-sided is what we’ll get.” And this is what we now have as the President.
Perfectly expressed, Mike. I’m angry, too. And although these pieces that you mentioned are fashioned as documentaries, they’re more like the term that’s been given them: Mock-umentaries. They’re a disservice to this leg of film.
You absolutely MUST see Obsession, then. That one cuts right to the heart of the matter.
http://www.ObsessiontheMovie.com
Thanks, Xd. I just added it to my Netflix queue. Was this get a mainstream theatrical release?
All I can say is — abso-flamin’-lutely AMEN.
I’m not sure if it was released in theaters or not, but I first saw it (an abbreviated version, I believe) on CNN. I was shocked, not by its contents, but that a mainstream outlet actually broadcast, for once, true and “incendiary” statements about the radical worldview of an internationl movement that has long been ignored.