An author recently wrote me asking about ways to promote their book. I’m no expert on marketing, by any stretch. However, I’ve learned from experience that blogging can be an effective marketing tool. That’s no revelation, to be sure. But pulling it off can be dreadfully hard for writers.
What makes that hard is typically two-fold: One is the time involved. It’s hard enough getting the stories in my head onto paper. Consistently cranking out compelling blog content is a whole other challenge. The second difficulty is coming up with ideas. I mean, what do we write about?
One author recently commented on this dilemma here:
“I don’t see the point to blogging. The only people who follow my blog are other writers. It isn’t that I don’t want to engage my readers. I want to. I just don’t know how to be relevant to them in a non-fiction forum… [I]f you have to spend inordinate amounts of time coming up with blog posts, then you’ve taken time away from another, potentially more productive [marketing] effort, that could have worked just as well or possibly even better for you. As yet, no one has proven to me that online presence activities are an absolute necessity. “
This author is expressing what many of us feel.
So how do writers resolve this conundrum? Well, some of us don’t. Which leads to “reactive blogger” syndrome. The reactive blogger works harder than they need to because they’re always looking for topics to blog about at the last minute. They know they should blog but, for the life of them, can’t seem to consistently find engaging material. It’s all been said better elsewhere, they reason. Who cares about my two cents?
That’s the dilemma. On the one hand, we’re told by all the experts that we need an online presence, a blog being one of them. On the other hand, we’re pressed by time and pressed for ideas.
The way I’ve resolved this is to break the rules. Okay, one rule in particular. This one:
Find your niche.
Bloggers are consistently encouraged to find a niche and then mine that audience. Finding your niche means narrowing your subject matter in order to target specific readers. Whether it’s
- Food
- Travel
- Parenting
- Sports
- Investments
- Technology
- Film
- Missions
- Music
- Writing
And the list goes on. The idea is that blogging randomly is antithetical to building a fan base. People want to know what they’re going to get when they come to your site. Will they get the latest publishing scoop? Will they get searing political commentary? Will they get up-to-the-minute gossip? But trying to do all three — publishing, politics, and gossip — is just wrong.
I dunno. I’ve just never been sold on that strategy. Sure, it might be good for attracting readers, but what about maintaining my sanity? I mean, my life isn’t about one thing, so why should my blogging be?
I’ve summarized my approach in my ABOUT page. It goes like this:
I blog about what interests me, and tend to jump around within topics. My subheader specifies Faith, Culture and Composition, three topics that inspire the bulk of my blogging… Because I’m a novelist, I talk a lot about writing-related issues. Because I’m a Christian writer, I blog about things related to theology, Christian fiction, faith-based stories, and the Christian publishing industry. Above all, I approach Decompose as a creative outlet, a laboratory, a record of interests, a ministry tool, a confessional, and a platform to engage readers, writers, and spiritual seekers.
I usually post three times a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. This is not a set-in-stone schedule, as I work full-time, write professionally, and value my mental health. Nevertheless, I do try to keep content rolling, even if it’s just lame posts about my Netflix queue or pics of my dogs.
I haven’t posted a lame pic of my dog lately. So maybe I’m due.
The point is, I just couldn’t keep sane if I had to blog about the same topic over and over and over. Sure, I like to dig into heavy subjects here. But, man, I’d go bonkers if those were the only subjects I covered.
All that to say: If I had to give advice to a blogger about how to have staying power, it would be this: Write about what interests you, when it interest you. If what interests you is all over the map, so be it.
Ultimately, it is more important that you blog regularly, than that you define a niche. People will read your blog long-term because they like your voice, appreciate your spin, and the community of commenters, not because you are an expert on any one given subject.
Good post. I agree. And I’m glad you aren’t always blogging about serious and/or controversial topics, because when I spend all day commenting on your blog I get nothing else done.
I had never thought about it this way. I am one of those writers that tries to keep all my blog posts vaguely within the entertainment realm, but perhaps I shouldn’t be too strict about it. Great post!
Mike, I generally think the “find your niche” advice is wrong when applied topically. I think the better advice is: FIND YOUR AUDIENCE.
Your audience isn’t limited to one topic they want to read about. For example, many of the popular mom-bloggers who write about the intersection of life and faith have a very diverse array of topics they cover in their blogs. But their audience is the smart, 30- and 40-something woman who has a family and a career (even if she’s not involved in her career at the moment). So these bloggers can blog about social issues, Biblical topics, funny parenting moments… all kinds of things, and still keep their audience coming back for more.
I think many writers can find their audience simply by being who they are just like you have. You have a wide variety of interests, but people know you as someone with wisdom; pretty strong theological views; an ability to challenge the status quo; and someone who is always interesting, especially when asking questions that challenge us to think more deeply about our faith. In other words, you’re hard to pigeonhole, but by being yourself, you’ve found your AUDIENCE rather than narrowly defining your topic.
Of course, some blogs are very successful because of their topical nature. For example, I subscribe to half a dozen blogging & web gurus blogs because that’s exactly the kind of information I want from them.
However, this isn’t always the case, and many bloggers find success by finding their audience rather than their “topic.”
That’s a good distinction, Rachelle. Topic and Audience. I have always struggled with the question of niche. Where do I fit? Frankly, I’m still unsure how to define my audience — Writers? Christian writers? Horror / Spec enthusiasts? Conservative Christians? Culture watchers? Wannabe intellectuals, like me? Maybe I shouldn’t worry too much about those labels, huh. Anyway, I appreciate your kind words.
Good point, Rachelle. I think of Katie Ganshert’s blog–she blogs on 3 different days about different topics, each of which is interesting to me. Plus, she seems like a nice person. And I always love the topics you come up with, Mike. Every time! Still trying to find my niches, which run the gamut from homeschooling to writing tips to Viking lore. I think incorporating weekly columns in things you enjoy talking about works well. (OOOH, and I LOVE some guest bloggers to spice things up!).
Mike – the main reason I consistently read your blog is because it is an intelligent commentary on a range of topics from a Christian point of view. (So, that makes me the wannabe intellectual who likes culture watching from a Christian perspective.)
Occasionally you talk about your books, but it’s not the main push. I like that. I follow some authors who are always talking either about their current book/next book, their current holiday/next holiday, or their son/daughter’s wedding/baby etc. It’s a way of connecting and seeming ‘real’ to readers – but I think the personal stuff might be better suited to Facebook.
And in response to your friend’s question about marketing, I’d say that marketing has four P’s: Product, Price, Place and Promotion. For trade-published authors, Price and Place are largely the decision and responsibility of the publisher. Responsibilty for Product and Promotion are shared (with a new P, Platform, being a large component of Promotion). Of course, self-published authors are responsible for everything (and have a nasty reputation for letting Product slide in their effort to get Promotion). No author should underestimate the importance of Product: a good book that people want to read and recommend to others.
I have never adhered to that rule, even though I came face to face with it shortly into my blogging career. I am adamant about reflecting Jesus in my writing, but I am interested in so many different things that I have a varied range of stuff I blog about.
I’m a lot like Don Miller who tests out his writing before it goes into his books. I only have one book published, but since 2006 I’ve written more than 860 blog posts at an average of 800-1000 words. That equals about 11 1/2 books @ 70K words per book.
Beyond fodder for books, it is hugely beneficial to practicing the art. Randy Ingermanson said a person who wants to write well needs to write at least 20 hours per week if he/she wants to be considered serious about writing.
I consider blogging the same thing. A serious writer will spend the time with his blog because it helps immensely with all kinds of writing techniques such as organization skills, succinct writing (packing with punch in smaller space), as well as developing/honing vocabulary and word variety. Grammar and spelling are the mechanics, blogging helps with the design, in my humble opinion 🙂 Blogging isn’t for everyone, because not everyone has the stamina. But, for a writer, it is almost the same thing as a pistol to a sheriff… going to work without might kill you.
PS… I miss your skeletons in conversation!
LOL! I think of that every time I click on the page with the new banner. 😎
Hey, I love those skeletons! Maybe I should bring them back…
Yes, well… tell which closet they are in and we might drag them out for you 😀
Interesting post . . . but mostly I came here for the dog pics.
I’ve decided to start entertaining myself with my blog. Otherwise, blogging gets to be like shoving bamboo shoots under my fingernails. Granted, I may wind up entertaining no one but myself. I look at it like this, though, if *I* am my brand, I may as well just be me. Maybe one day, people will follow me on twitter just because they think I’m cool. I’ll amass a following bigger than the populations of some small countries. I can see it now. My name in lights. Preceded by @. Hee hee.
And Jessica, I’m subscribing to your RSS (I don’t think I already have!) because I just love the way you wrote that paragraph. Bamboo shoots…yeah!
Thanks Heather! 🙂
“entertaining myself with my blog”
That’s basically my only strategy….
Like others, the reason this blog is so enjoyable is because of the diversity of topics.
BTW, discussions and pics of dogs are never lame. 😎
Blogs that are only ever about one thing start to become really repetitious and boring. Although technically my blog is only about one thing–“what I am thinking about at that moment”. So while not necessarily repetitious it can get really…weird.
Thanks, this was just what I needed to hear today! As a newbie blogger, I’ve been struggling with this very question, after seeing numerous recommendations that I have to pick a niche and make my mark there.
My focus more or less is about my journey to becoming a writer. But I’m not even a writer yet, just a wannabe, so what could I possibly contribute out of all the writing blogs out there? Now I feel better about just writing what I want to write without worrying too much about it.
You’ve echoed all of my sentiments of blogging, Mike. I wish I could come up with content as engaging as yours.
Amen! When I started my blog I never intended to use it to promote my writing, because I didn’t want to be trapped into writing about writing like all the other writer/bloggers I knew. I called it the Idea Factory, and that’s precisely what it is. I dump ideas there. All sorts of ideas. Theology, telepathy, reviews, time travel… and rants about how all TV shows are identical if you watch them long enough. In fact, the real reason I started it was for that last reason… I wanted to write in depth articles comparing “parallel episodes”; identical plots in more than one show.
So I’m very glad to hear my “the-devil-may-care” attitude backed up by someone else’s theories! Thanks!